Perspectives — We See Them As We AreAdelaide, South Australia
The ApproachThe signature model The Augmented FunctionAI & digital capability The WorkThe case studies The SeriesPacks & toolkits PerspectivesThe throughline The LineHow I got here The Way InHow to work together Get in TouchA 45-min chat
Perspectives›We See Them As We Are›03 · The Equation
Part 03 · The System

One wave, four dials.

Feeling = emotion + context. The four dials that turn six standard-issue waves into every feeling you’ve ever had — and a field guide to all of them.

Part one drew the line: an emotion happens in the body, a feeling is made in the mind. This part structures what the mind actually does in between. The short version is one sentence long: a feeling is an emotion plus context. The useful version notices that context isn’t one thing — it decomposes into four questions, answered in about a second, usually without our permission.

Feeling = Emotion + Target + Stakes + History + Identity
The wave, standard-issue  ·  the context term — bespoke, and where all the work is
Dial 01

Target

What does this touch?

A task · a person · a principle · me

Dial 02

Stakes

How much rides on it?

Low → high. The volume dial.

Dial 03

History

Has this happened before?

First time → pattern → decades-old file

Dial 04

Identity

What does it say about me?

Not about me → a verdict on me

The multiplier

Three dials adjust the feeling; the fourth changes its nature. When Identity enters the context — when the event becomes a verdict on the self — feelings get heavier and stickier. Fear becomes insecurity. Sadness becomes shame. If a reaction seems bigger than its event, a dial you can’t see is turned to maximum.

The Equation At Work

Same wave, seven weathers.

Hold the emotion constant and turn only the dials. One wave — anger — produces seven different feelings, seven different conversations, and seven different things a leader should do next. Nothing below changes except context:

EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Angera tasklowfirst timenot about me→Annoyed
Angeran obstaclemediumrecurringnot about me→Frustrated
Angera principlehighpatternnot about me→Indignant
Angera personhighlong pattern, tallied“they don’t value me”→Resentful
Angera personhighyears, retold“I was a fool to trust”→Bitter
Angermyselfhigh—“I did harm”→Guilty
Angermyselfhighpattern“I am the harm”→Ashamed
Blends fit too

Betrayed = surprise + anger + hurt sharing one context: a person target, high stakes, a trust history, an identity term. Blindsided = the same compound where the anger is about process, not outcome. Jealous = fear + anger with a rival in the target dial.

The Field Guide

Every wave, dialled.

The anger table is one chapter of a larger field guide. Below are all six waves run through the same four dials — open a family to unfold it. The rule holds everywhere: read across any row and nothing changes except context. A feeling word is just a wave with its dial-settings compressed into a syllable or two.

The fear familysomething I value is at risk
EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Feara specific moment aheadlowfirst timenot about me→Nervous
Fearan outcomemediumon a loopnot about me→Worried
Fearno clear objectmediumhumming for weeksnot about me→Anxious
Fearmy standinghighpattern“am I actually enough?”→Insecure
Feartoo many fronts at oncehighcompounding“I can’t hold this”→Overwhelmed
Fearsomething certain, approachinghigh—not about me→Dread

The costume: fear almost never comes to work dressed as fear. It arrives as control — micromanagement, endless requests for detail, the person who won’t delegate.

The sadness familysomething has been lost
EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Sadnessa hoped-for outcomelowfirst timenot about me→Disappointed
Sadnesseffort and progressmediumrepeated losses“why keep trying?”→Discouraged
Sadnessa person who matteredhigha trust history“I mattered less than I thought”→Hurt
Sadnessconnectionmediumongoing“I’m not part of this”→Lonely
Sadnessthe future tensehigha long accumulationnot about me→Hopeless
Sadnesssomething irreplaceablehigh—not about me→Grief

The armour: cynicism is very often hurt or disappointment wearing armour — “I no longer let myself hope, because hoping cost me.” A cynical long-tenured employee is frequently a formerly idealistic one.

The disgust familyget away from this
EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Disgusta behaviourlowfirst timenot about me→Put off
Disgusta decisionmediumrecurringnot about me→Disapproving
Disgusta standard, violatedhighpatternnot about me→Appalled
Disgusta person, plus superiorityhigha long tally“I’m above this”→Contemptuous

The one to catch early: anger wants repair; contempt wants distance. When “I’m angry at them” becomes “I’ve lost respect for them,” the lane has changed.

The surprise familyupdate everything
EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Surprisenew informationlow—not about me→Curious
Surprisemy map of how things workmedium—not about me→Confused
Surprisea decision made about mehigha trust history“I didn’t count enough to be told”→Blindsided
Surprise (+ anger + hurt)a person I trustedhigha trust history“I was a fool to trust”→Betrayed

The multiplier wave: surprise hands off within seconds to whatever comes next — which is why consultation isn’t a courtesy; it’s surprise-management.

The joy familymore of this
EmotionTargetStakesHistoryIdentity→ The feeling
Joya task, done welllow—not about me→Pleased
Joythe futuremedium—not about me→Hopeful
Joywhat might be cominghigh—“this could be mine”→Excited
Joymy own workhigh—“I did that”→Proud
Joysomeone’s helpmedium—not about me→Grateful
Joya load, liftedhighcarried for two years“…but others are hurting”→Relieved — then guilty

Good weather has filters too: some won’t let it stand — relief turns to guilt, pride to “who am I to,” excitement gets dampened in advance to protect against disappointment.

Six waves, some forty weathers — and every one of them discussable, once you know which dial is doing the work.

Run It Backwards

The frame earns its keep in reverse.

If a feeling is an emotion plus context, then context is the feeling minus the emotion — and that subtraction is the whole diagnostic method. You can’t negotiate with the wave; it’s physiology, and it already happened. But every dial is discussable. “Resentful” minus anger leaves: a person, high stakes, a long tally, an identity wound — four conversations, none of which are “calm down.”

The wave is standard-issue. The dials are yours alone. Which is why no two people have ever had quite the same feeling — and why the same event never lands twice the same way.
The Practice Connection

What the dials are really asking.

Run the subtraction often enough and a pattern appears: the dials keep producing answers to the same three questions — the three on the front page of this practice. They’re not a separate model; they’re what the equation computes. When a feeling walks into your office, it is almost always answering one of these:

Question 01 · Power & Control

“Whose priorities matter?”

The Target and Stakes dials feed this one. Frustration at being overridden, resentment at decisions made about you without you — the agency question beneath most of what gets labelled “resistance to change.”

Where you’ve seen it: the anger row of the field guide above, run through a restructure.

Question 02 · Care, Closeness & Kindness

“Who has my back?”

The History dial feeds this one — and the belonging weathers of Part 2 are its forecast: alone as the event; lonely, rejected and abandoned as what we build on it. The trust question.

Where you’ve seen it: Part 02 — the stories we didn’t write.

Question 03 · Respect & Recognition

“Do I matter to you?”

The Identity dial feeds this one — the dignity question, and the deepest of the three. Shame and hurt wearing anger’s costume; often what’s really being defended in a performance conversation.

Where it goes next: Part 04 — the two conversations where this is worth money.

Why this matters for the practice: the four frames organise the work; these three questions tell you how it lands. Every engagement runs on both — see The Approach — and this equation is the engine underneath the questions.

The Throughline

We don’t see things as they are — we see them as we are.

If this series landed somewhere real for you or your organisation, the next conversation is about you: where you are, where you need to be, and what would move it.

Start the conversation →
The People Practice · Au · — Perspectives Examples are set at Ironbark, a fictional composite organisation; details are de-identified. Also available as a print edition. Back to the front page
↑Back to the top